Friday, June 19, 2009

Teaching reflection on subjective grading...

I was reading a blog post by Ms. C over at her blog: Cant of Cheating and Judging and it really made me think tonight. She is obviously a gifted teacher and very insightful thinker. One of her comments made me think deeper about what I have been working on over the past two years with Assessment for Learning and my adjustment in my grading practices. Here is what I wrote:

I just wanted to make a comment about something you said,

"one of the goals of those who seek to refine grading systems is that they want to make grades less subjective and more objective-- admirable on the surface, if not a bit unrealistic, but let's leave that aside."

It really interested me. In the past two years I have changed my viewpoint. I tried to be "less subjective" and what it always brought out in my teaching and corresponding student learning was too much rote or simple learning. So I have used the principles of Assessment for Learning and re-assessment to focus on being much more subjective.

I have done so in these ways,
1) Students have multiple avenues for feedback. I have encouraged students to use a window of time to turn work in to me, get feedback and then redo it for a better assessment.
2) Re-assessment of homework, quizzes and tests that do not reach a level of 85 or above. They have one opportunity to come in to reassess and the must come in for tutoring/feedback and extension of learning before this occurs.
3) Constant encouragement of students to use me, their teacher, as a reference to improve their learning. I try to show the learning objective/target, rubric, and what I am asking for them upfront, but I am removing the guessing game by having them work with me to improve their aim.

What I have found is that there is less cheating. Students are seeing that the class is not about a "gotcha" grade, but rather it is focused on improvement. Anyone can improve their grade if it is not up to their satisfaction. It has improved student motivation, effort, and by the end of the year I had some real breakthroughs with students I didn't expect to pass the class at the beginning of the year.

Although I understand these procedures wouldn't be welcome at all schools, I am lucky enough to work at a school where the focus is on the student's learning and what we can do to move them closer to that.

In your discussion of the moral consequences of cheating, I thought I might offer this up as a potential positive alternative.
I wonder if cheating is really something students would do more of if they felt trapped by their situation? For instance, if they know they have an opportunity to re-assess that test for a grade up to an 85, will they cheat less? I don't know the truth behind it, but I know how it feels in my classroom. I have less looks of fear, frustration and resentment about tests, quizzes and homework. Students seem to look at those assessments as less about 'finality' and more about where they are at that point in their learning.

I don't know. It just made me think a little bit tonight.

2 Comments:

"Ms. Cornelius" said...

Hey, 40-- thanks for reading my post.

I think that grading will never be 100% objective-- that's all I meant by that remark. It does involve judgment, especially when you talk about writing or some other skill which is hard to quantify. We should all aim to make grades as objective as possible, and should continuously reflect on our practices to try to achieve that.

It is wonderful that you model that reflection and are constantly seeking to improve your practices!

Providing adequate support before the grade is taken is vital to students not feeling like they received a "gotcha" grade.

But sometimes the unintended consequences of "standards-based" grading is that there is not time to actually teach and coach. In our district, the elementary schools went to a "standards-based" grading system a few years ago. There were over 75 standards on a third grade report card-- all of which had to be assessed every few weeks. Teachers repeatedly reported that they had to constantly assess every little specific standard, and instructional time practically disappeared. I know my own students reported that they felt like they were constantly being assessed over material that they had not had enough time to practice. That is completely counterproductive.

Mr. Duez said...

thanks for commenting Ms. C.

I am not in favor of 'standards based grading' in the high school. My belief is that we need to tweak the current system, not ditch it.

For example, with the use of presenting learning objectives/targets before the learning occurs, feedback during the learning, and reassessment opportunities one can be certain that students are on track. Rather than teach and then take an assessment "of" the learning, we are assessing "for" the learning. Subtle but important difference.

Standards based (whereby we would be ditching letters or numbers and GPA) would only cause confusion IMHO.

So I guess we agree there. :)